Premier League targets £750m commercial pot as big six resist rights pooling
The Premier League’s traditional “big six” are resisting plans to pool more commercial rights centrally, setting up a dispute over how far the league should prioritise collective revenue growth over the individual earning power of its biggest clubs.
The Premier League’s biggest clubs are opposing proposals to expand the collective sale of commercial rights, with the dispute centred on whether more matchday inventory should be controlled centrally.According to The Telegraph, the league wants to pool additional assets, particularly perimeter LED advertising, and package them with its existing sponsorship inventory in an effort to significantly increase central commercial revenue.Premier League executives believe annual commercial income could potentially rise from around £200m to £750m if more rights are sold collectively.That would represent a substantial increase in the value of the league’s central sponsorship operation, which already includes partnerships with brands such as Guinness, Coca-Cola, EA Sports, Microsoft and Puma.The most recently published central distributions showed commercial revenue of £158m in 2024-25, part of total Premier League payments to clubs of £2.8bn. Each club received an equal £7.9m share of that commercial income.Commercial distributions for 2025-26 are expected to rise to around £200m.The proposal is being resisted by the traditional big six, which view greater centralisation as a potential restriction on their ability to maximise revenues independently.Manchester United are among the clubs concerned that pooling additional inventory could limit their capacity to monetise their own global commercial appeal, particularly in areas such as stadium advertising.That creates a wider question around revenue distribution. If the Premier League secures significantly more income by using rights generated by its largest clubs, those teams are likely to push for a greater share rather than an equal division across all 20 members.No agreement has yet been reached on how any additional revenue would be distributed.The dispute also sits within a broader debate over the league’s financial model and the extent to which clubs should be allowed to use their individual revenue-generating power to increase spending.Manchester United and Manchester City were among those that successfully opposed the proposed “anchoring” spending rule last year, which would have linked the maximum expenditure of leading clubs to the central income received by the league’s lowest-paid team.The Premier League subsequently introduced its squad cost ratio system, limiting football-related spending to 85% of revenue, although six clubs voted against the regulations.The commercial rights proposal was discussed in February and again ahead of the Premier League AGM in June.It is expected to return to the agenda at the next shareholders’ meeting on September 24, with the league seeking a structure capable of unlocking substantially greater sponsorship revenue without restricting the commercial ambitions of its largest clubs.